The Role and Significance of Error Linguistics in a Second Language Environment

Joseph- Kenneth kelechi Nzerem, Prisca Odinakachi Bob

Abstract


Despite the fact that learners of the English language in non-native environments strive to attain native speakers’standard, their performance is replete with various forms of errors capable of causing infidelity in communication. This study investigates the significance of error linguistics in a Second Language environment. It states that errors are inevitable parts of language learning. They are indications that there exists a learning process. The study argues that although the making of errors is significant in the learning process, there is need to identify, locate, quantify and assess errors committed by learners. Therefore, error linguistics becomes a tool in the hands of linguists to unravel the mystery surrounding the making of errors. The study hinges on the behaviourist theory which is a psychological theory that emphasizes on observable behaviour. It was propounded by J. B. Watson, E. L. Thorndike and B. F. Skinner. The causes of errors as stated in this studyinclude: lack of motivation, First Language interference, translation of idiomatic expressions and overgeneralization. The study classifies errors into inter-lingual and intra-lingual as well as distinguishes between errors and mistakes. It therefore presents procedures used for error analysis in error linguistics which hopefully would reduce the number of errors committed by a Second Language learner of the English language.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chomsky, N. (1965). Reflections on language. New York: Newbury House.

Corder, S. P. (1967). “Significance of learner’s errors.” In International review of applied linguistics. pp. 20-33, London: Hieneman Educational Books.

Dulay, H. C. & Burt, M. K. (1974). “You can’t learn without goofing: An analysis of children’s second language errors.” In Richards, J. C. (ed.), Error analysis: perspective on second language acquisition. London: Longman.

Ellis, R. & Tomlinson, B. (2011). Teaching secondary English: A guide to the teaching of English as a second language. London: Longman Group.

Ellis, R. & Barkuizen, G. (2015). Analysis of learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Headbloom, A. G. (1979). The techniques of language teaching. London: Longman Group.

Little, J. & Wood, W. (2006). Foreign and second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mahmoud, I. (2014). “Patterns of spelling errors. In The journal of English language teaching. Vol.XXII, No. 3, pp 276-301.

Norish, S. (1983). “Errors study.” In General Linguistics. Vol. IX. No. 7, pp 6-33

Otagburuagu, E. J. et al (2016). Essay on language & literature: An introductory approach to the study of stylistics and applied linguistics. Enugu: University of Nigeria Press Ltd.

Otagburuagu, E. J., Ogenyi, L. C., & Ezema P. A. (2013). Language teaching & learning: A functional approach for ESL practitioners. Enugu: Snap Press Ltd.

Richard, J. C. (1974). Error analysis: Perfectives on second language acquisition London: Longman.

Richard, et al (2002). Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition. London: Longman.

Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behaviour of organisms: An experimental analysis. London: Hidder & Strongton.

Stevens, L. S. (1969). Practices in second language acquisition. London: Oxford.

Warker, K. & Dell, B. (2006). “Error discovery in effective teaching.” In Approaches in error study. Vol. 4, pp. 38-55.

Watson, J. B. (1927). The behaviour analyst. New York: Macmillian.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Joseph- Kenneth kelechi Nzerem, Prisca Odinakachi Bob